Follow-up sent · Needles, California
City asked for the Flock agreement, purchase order and invoices.
Messages sent:
Summary posted:
A reply to the City Clerk, copied to the City Manager, thanks the City for the signed resolution and notes that the rest of the file was already public. It asks first for the signed agreement or order form with its terms; purchase order 025069 and the invoices behind the City’s two recorded payments to Flock; any renewal or cancellation terms; and the Sheriff’s written request to use COPS funds, citing Government Code section 30061(c)(2). It asks the City to say in writing if the resolution and quote are its only contract documents, and to give its determination for each part of the request.
Wording from the message
“If the resolution and quote are the only contract documents the City has, please tell me that in writing.”
What this establishes
Sending is verified; the City’s answer has not arrived. Asking for a record does not establish that it exists. The full September 8 request remains open.
What happens next
Superseded on September 24: the City Clerk wrote that all eight narrowed records are still being searched for and that the City anticipates the next production or status update by September 30.
Project-prepared summary of correspondence. Personal details, signatures, email headers and account links are omitted. This is not the full correspondence or an organization-published document.